WebbHIPPISLEY v. KNEE BROTHERS. [1905] 1 K. B. 1. ACTION to recover discounts allowed to plaintiff's agents on a .printer's bill in advertising plaintiff's goods for sale, and also … WebbHippisley v Knee Brothers Case of auctioneer who acted as agent selling his principal's painting and received a reduced price for the advert. Imageview Management v Jack The agents personal interests come second to those of their clients. He must not allow his own interests to get in the way. Students also viewed Commercial Law 137 terms BNT324
5: Agency Flashcards by Mark Lo Brainscape
WebbHippisley v Knee Brothers (1905, CA) Facts: H employed K (auctioneers) to sell some property for him for which he agreed to pay a commission and expenses (including … WebbFaraji (1994) IRLR 264 387Hindcastle Ltd v Barbara Attenborough Associates Ltd [1996] 1 WLR 262 572Hippisley v. Knee Bros. [1905] 1 KB 1 345 Hivac Ltd v. Park Royal … cooks uniforms
The Relationships of Agency (UK-World) – worldanatomyblog
WebbGadd v Houghton (1876) 1 Ex D 357 CA ..... 83 WILSON_9781788979870_t.indd 28 23/10/2024 15:53 Martin Wilson ... Hippisley v Knee Bros [1905] 1 KB 1..... 67 Holland … Webb26 okt. 2024 · Andrew v. Ramsay & Co., 72 LJKB 865, [1903] 2 KB 635, [1903] 2 KB 635, 19 TLR 620 (not available on CanLII) Baring v. Stanton, 3 Ch D 502 (not available on CanLII) 1917-05-01 Barry v. Stoney Point Canning Co., 1917 CanLII 620 (SCC) Clough v. London and North Western ... Webb26 okt. 2024 · Andrew v. Ramsay & Co., 72 LJKB 865, [1903] 2 KB 635, [1903] 2 KB 635, 19 TLR 620 (not available on CanLII) Baring v. Stanton, 3 Ch D 502 (not available on … family hotels in shirdi